Friday, September 2, 2011

Twin Towers Tribute


Here is a really nice montage of movies over the past 30+ years in which the Twin Towers have had a cameo role. Video by Dan Meth http://vimeo.com/28171399
Here is a CNN report on Dan’s video, which features snips of the clips from his video, which apparently took
 him 7 months of working on and off to create.  See the Vimeo link above for the actual montage by Dan. 

Before the onslaught of horrifying images of past destruction start inundating us in the media as the 10th anniversary of 9-11 approaches next week, I thought it might be nice to take a fond look back at New York City’s World Trade Center as it stood for 30+ years before the attacks.  This posting was instigated by seeing a video on Dan Meth’s blog, my favorite video cartoonist.  He spent 7 months working on and off to create a montage of movies that feature the Twin Towers in a cameo role.  It is really cool, and it started me thinking about my personal love-hate relationship (or rather, hate-tolerate relationship!) with the Twin Towers, during the time they were being built and afterward, when I lived (and also worked, for many years) in eyesight of them.
     Yes, the Twin Towers featured prominently in many seminal movies about NYC.  They were the symbol of “modern” New York of the fin de siècle 20th century, the way the Empire State Building was the iconic architecture in the first half of the 20th century.  In a strange way, I totally understood how the terrorists, in their misguided misunderstanding of American culture, could have confused the Twin Towers with something that truly emblemized America, represented America, something that was truly important.  After all, if they had been paying attention to the Hollywood movies for the past 40 years, they might be forgiven for thinking that the Twin Towers personified the American Dream and typified the average American's ambitions.  The Twin Towers had a cameo role in hundreds of movies.  A shot of the Twin Towers set the scene, was worth a thousand words. 
In the interests of full disclosure, when the Twin Towers first went up, I hated them and everything they stood for.  I disliked their phallic imperiousness, the way they destroyed a gritty “authentic” part of the city - the low-rise and somewhat shabby Lower West Side, an area known for its electrical wholesale district, some remnants of the old wholesale produce and meat markets, and seedy strip clubs and topless bars.  It was the old NYC waterfront the way I remember it growing up, and I loved that area of dilapidated old warehouses and ancient tenement buildings, some of which stood alone and slightly off-kilter, like the sole remaining tooth in a smile where all the other buildings on the block had already been extracted, and were surrounded usually by the black gums of asphalt parking lots. This was all changed forever once the World Trade Center (WTC) was built. 
In my opinion, the architecture of the WTC was nothing to write home about, either - the aesthetic was unlovable and impersonal and very corporate-boring, and its plaza on a windy day was not only unusable by humans, it was downright hazardous to one’s health.  And I had even less love for the building infrastructure and all its out-of-the-ordinary building codes.  It didn’t have to adhere to typical NYC building and fire codes because technically it was not part of NYC, it was a project of the bi-state entity called the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (or what, when I was a kid, we always referred to as the “Port of Authority,” a meaningless corruption of its original name, “The Port of New York Authority”).  The World Trade Center was built on land (landfill, actually) that was under the jurisdiction of the bi-state entity, and therefore was exempt from all NYC zoning laws and other such ordinances.  As an adult, I designed several multi-floor interior projects in the WTC, and so came to know first-hand about its singular set of building codes and land use regulations that applied to the complex of buildings.  In a word, it was a pain in the butt to do any construction work within the WTC. It certainly wasn't because the rules were more stringent, (they were NOT!) but that they were significantly different from NYC's code and therefore confusing and occasionally conflicting. 
I watched the WTC being built, the same way that 15 years or so later I watched the construction of the whole Battery Park City development.  It was fascinating.  I lived about ½ mile from the site, and for a number of years, could look out my windows and watch the construction progress of much of the Lower West Side of Manhattan. I also walked and biked along the Hudson River to watch the construction of BPC and the park, and almost always ended up down by the WTC.   I still didn’t love the Twin Towers, but they grew on me over time, and after BPC started taking shape, the Twin Towers seemed to have more of a contextual relationship with the downtown landscape.  I reluctantly accepted them as a part of the “new” New York.  Out with the gritty city, in with the slick, sleek, and glossy.  Even as they were being built, they already seemed like an anachronism to me, from some other time in the past where we looked forward to a “space-age” future which would include a life of individual flying machines with everyone whirling about in the air like the Jetsons. 
I was hardly alone in my negative views of the WTC.  Even Lewis Mumford, the renowned architecture and urban planning critic, thought they were an abomination.  He denounced the WTC as an “example of the purposeless giantism and technological exhibitionism that are now eviscerating the living tissue of every great city,” (The Pentagon of Power, 1970).  Aside from concerns about the design of the complex, there were practical problems as well.  The “superblock” concept interrupted the NYC street grid and disrupted both pedestrian and vehicular traffic flow, and the heavily subsidized office space created a glut in the market that was already over-saturated with office space in a financially-troubled city where many corporate headquarters had started moving away to the less expensive, lower tax rates, less crime-ridden and “safer” suburbs, and the southern states. 
In any event, they were there, and I and most other New Yorkers ended up tolerating them.  I saw them every day, worked near them for a time, had clients whose office space was in the buildings, worked on projects in them, took the “E” train which terminated in their vast subterranean depths, went on a few job interviews in them, and rode my bike in their shadow almost every day at certain points in my life.  They were part of my life, my every day mundane existence.  And the thought that one day they would not be there anymore would not have occurred to me any more than the idea that the Hudson River would one day be gone, that is how permanent they seemed to me.  Despite my fear of super-high-rise elevators, I routinely took clients (and visitors from out of town) to “Windows on the World” the slightly dizzy-making restaurant on the top floor, which on many days was enveloped in clouds and swayed about 6 feet or so from one side to the other. 
I do miss the Twin Towers.  It is a great loss.  They were definitely considered by many to be an eyesore, but they were OUR eyesore.  The Twin Towers were how you could orient yourself when you were downtown in the mediaeval maze of streets in the Financial District, formerly known as Nieuwe Amsterdam.  They were part of the compass rose pointing west.  I remember how you could be way out in the far reaches of Queens or Brooklyn, miles from downtown, for instance in the pristine and remote wetlands of Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge, the Gateway National Park out there, flat as a pancake, with geese, mallards, gulls, and diamondback terrapins everywhere, and then look up and see the Twin Towers framing the view.  They were omnipresent.  They were quintessential.  No wonder they figured in so many movies. 

I also remember the time in 1974 that Philippe Petit, the French high-wire artist, walked the 140 feet between the roofs of the North and the South Towers on a steel cable and then was promptly arrested.  NYC held its collective breath for the 45 minutes that it took for him to make the journey.  This act was featured as an iconic 1970’s NYC event in the fabulous book “Let the Great World Spin” by Colum McCann, and was also made into a documentary movie “Man on Wire,” http://www.manonwire.com/

Photo from http://gothamist.com/2008/07/24/philippe_petit_man_on_wire.php, which also contains an interview with Petit.

Of course, the loss of any building, even two of 110 stories each, and six more smaller towers thrown in for good measure, pales in comparison to the loss of human life that occurred on September 11th, 10 years ago.  Two former work colleagues of mine who had taken "good" jobs in the WTC perished in that awful day, and every 9/11 anniversary during the reading of the names, I wait to hear their names read off the list of thousands.  Ezra Aviles and Peter Guylavary.  I still wonder about the wisdom of replacing the WTC with the Freedom Tower. 
Ten years ago, I remember looking out my windows on Washington Street, and watching hundreds of zombie-like office workers, some toting attaché cases and briefcases, covered head to toe in grey ash, trudging uptown, since there was no other transportation option that day.  I remember being frightened and not knowing what to do, whether or not to evacuate, and if so, where to go, and how to get there?  How to transport my three cats and all my turtles on the handles of my mountain bike?  I remember obsessively cleaning my coffee machine like a maniac, just to do something mindless so I didn’t have to think about what was going on.  I remember breathing the awful fumes for weeks and weeks, and recalling from my work on the building years before how it was filled with asbestos.  I remember passing St. Vincent’s Hospital and seeing hundreds of missing persons flyers posted with people’s photos and descriptions, and how it took us many days to realize that there weren’t any missing persons, just dead persons.  The flyers became more and more tattered as time went by, but no one removed them.  How all the First Responders had flooded into NYC from surrounding areas and far away, how we all stood along the West Side Highway every evening and cheered the firefighters and others from around the country as they rode uptown after working crazy-long and dangerous shifts at Ground Zero, the newly-minted name for what had been, until just a few days before, the WTC.  I remember the gut-wrenching feeling I got the first time I passed by my corner on the way home and looked to my left downtown and didn’t see the Twin Towers standing there anymore, obstructing my view of the sky, just a smoldering pit, and it smoldered for months.  The strange feeling I got the first time I saw an “E” train enter the station, with the sign in the first car pronouncing it was heading to “WTC,” which existed no more.  How we didn’t know if there would be another attack, or how soon.  When life would ever return to normal (it never really did).

Perplexing Perpetual Protection (not Peter Pan)

A case of perpetual copyright protection has been puzzling me, and it is not Peter Pan (s. 301 CDPA 1988) for a change, but universities.

The Copyright Act 1775, also referred to as the University Act 1775, was implemented after the House of Lords had established in Donaldson v Beckett ([1774] 4 Burr 2408) that there was no such thing as a perpetual copyright at common law parallel to the Statute of Anne. It bestowed the right on "the Two Universities in England, the Four Universities in Scotland, and the several colleges of Eton, Westminster, and Winchester to hold in Perpetuity their Copy Right in Books given to or bequeathed to the said Universities and Colleges".

So why do I care, surely the CDPA 1988 or even one of its predecessors repealed the Act? Well, yes and no. In para 13(1) Sch 1 CDPA 1988, it says that "[t]he rights conferred on universities and colleges by the Copyright Act 1775 shall continue to subsist until the end of the period of 50 years from the end of the calendar year in which the new copyright provisions come into force and shall then expire." Para 13(2) goes on to state that exceptions and limitations, remedies, provisions with respect to licensing and the provisions on the Copyright Tribunal apply to those rights in the same way as in relation to "normal" copyright.

While technically repealed by the CDPA 1988, the Copyright Act/Universities Act 1775 is still in force for practical purposes and continues to be applicable until 31 December 2039. Given that state of affairs, I find it very vexing (am I falling into 18th century parlance here, or do you still say that?) that I cannot seem to find the complete text anywhere. The Legislation Services Team at legislation.gov.uk have informed me that there are no plans to include the Act on their website in the foreseeable future either.

If any of our kind readers happen to have the text of the Act, I would be very grateful if they could post it in the comments section or email it to me. I would also be very interested to hear whether the list of beneficiaries was extended at any point in time (hello, University of London colleges?) and if anyone knows of any practical cases where that right was enforced. Many thanks in advance!


Down Down, Deeper and Down.

What do Justin Bieber, Rhianna, Lady Gaga , Beyonce and Shakira have in common? Well you can make your own minds up about their music, but they are undoubtedly some of the biggest pop stars on the global music jukebox at the moment – and NONE of them are signed to iLCreation. Why do I mention iLCreation – well this entity managed to get videos by Bieber, Gaga, Shakira, Rhianna, Beyonce and others including Bruno Mars and Miley Cyrus taken down from YouTube. Seemingly rather easily.

Many of the artistes who whose videos were targeted had performed at the 2011 MTV Video Music Awards last Sunday (where Beyonce announced her pregnancy to the World)and according to Webpronews an unknown individual using the name iLCreation submitted a copyright claim on numerous videos including Miley Cyrus’ “Party In The USA”, Rhianna’s “What’s My Name” and. Lady Gaga’s “Bad Romance” and following its standard procedures, YouTube pulled down the video including Bieber’s entire Vevo channel, it seems without requiring any form of verification that the claimant had the right to request the take-down.

Vevo initially posted a statement that explained, “Someone is making false copyright claims against the Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga channels and YouTube has blocked access to the videos as a result. We are working with YouTube to resolve ASAP.” The videos could still be seen on Vevo’s own site. Vevo, part owned by major record labels Sony and Universal, issued a formal statement that read, “A few videos by Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga were briefly taken down by YouTube as a result of false copyright claims. This issue has been resolved.” Almost all of the video affected by the fake notices were restored within a couple of hours. As one commentator added “It’s particularly ironic for Bieber…. seeing as how Youtube is where he started”

YouTube uses several automated systems for removing unauthorized content, including ContentID, but copyright owners also can submit individual claims using an online form.

Shakira's "Waka Waka" has had 390 million viewers on YouTube. iLCreation is now the most “hated person on Twitter”. Allegedly.


http://www.webpronews.com/justin-bieber-lady-gaga-videos-pulled-from-youtube-2011-08

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Get a Toll Free Number Instantly

You’re starting a new business or breathing new life into an existing one. You’ve come to the conclusion that a toll free number will help you get more sales prospects and orders. It will also improve your reputation for fast and easy customer service. Now that you’ve made the decision you’d love to get started right away. But you have to wait at least a week to establish a toll free number, right?

In a hurry for a toll free number? Get yours instantly right now...Wrong! You can have your toll free number up and running in less time that it takes you to read this article. If you don’t want to wait even that long, order and activate your toll free number now. Yes, you can have an 800, 855, 866, 877 or 888 toll free number for your business or personal use as close to instantly as possible.

How does this work. It’s all thanks to the highly efficient online provisioning process from Kall8. They have gone to the trouble of setting up a large collection of toll free numbers, so all you have to do is select one you like the look or sound of and place your order. You pay for these with a credit card that is also billed monthly for your service, so there is no long approval process involved.

How much will a toll free number set you back? Hold on to your chair so you fall off. The cost is just $2 each for 888, 877, 866 or 855 prefixes. That’s what you pay to get your number assigned and set up for use. Then the cost is just $2 a month to maintain service plus the cost of incoming calls on a per minute basis.

Note that the older 800 toll free numbers are slightly more expensive. Those are $5 each and $5 per month plus the cost of calls.

There are even more expensive vanity numbers that spell out specific words on the telephone keyboard to make them easier to remember. Examples of numbers now on the vanity list are 1-877-9-Alimony (1-888-925-4666) and 1-877-5-BIGMONEY (1-877-524-4666). The prices on these vary from $15 to over $100 for setup and monthly fee. What’s an example of an expensive one? How about 1-877-5-MESOTHELIOMA (1-877-563-7684).

What do you get with your Kall8 toll free service? First, you get your number ready to use as soon as you complete the order process that takes only a few minutes. You specify which phone you want incoming calls to go to. These numbers don’t have their own phone line. Instead, you program them to ring to your office phone, home phone, cell phone or other phone that you’ll be near. You can change this ring-to number any time as your location changes so that you’ll never miss a call.

Do you get voice mail? Yes, it’s included. You can call in to get messages from the system or have them sent to you as attachments to your email. That way you can hear your messages on your computer without having to pick up a phone. You’ll also be able to get FAX messages sent to your email as attachments. No need for a separate fax machine to get messages. Just tell clients to send them to your toll free number.

Other features include call blocking, maximum call length setting, Caller ID, and even conference calling with up to 25 participants. These features are included as part of your monthly service fee, starting at just $2 per month.

How much will you pay for calls? The cost to the caller is free, of course. You pay 6.9 center per minute for calls from the 48 US states and Canada. There is a surcharge for calls that come in from Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, Guam and Saipan. Payphone callers will cost you an extra 60 cents per call, per FCC tariff.

With toll free numbers as cheap as $2 each and $2 a month, plus 6.9 cents a minute for most incoming calls, it’s hard to go wrong getting a toll free number for your business. There are no contacts involved, so if you don’t want the service anymore, you can simply cancel and only pay for the usage to date.

Are you ready to pick out a number and get it working for you? If so, then choose your toll free number and order it now. It will be ready for use right away.



Follow Telexplainer on Twitter

Friday Frolcs - How Do You See Love?

Gosh, how quickly time flies! It's Friday again and the first Friday of the eighth lunar month. For the traditional Chinese community, there'd be more engagements and weddings this month. The eighth month is auspicious for such happy occasions. Let's go lovey-dovey this Friday too and find out how we see love..












You See Love As Sweet













You are a ton of fun, and you love to bond with others. You make instant friends with people.



Whenever you are single, you are very ready to love. You have an open heart.







You are an easy person to be with and an easy person to love. You are a joy to be around.



If you have good food, good company, and good weather, then there's not much more you can ask for.



Game 1 Preview -- SMU Mustangs



For many College Football fans, it has been a long 9 months.  However, we are now officially in a game week!  The bad news is Texas A&M fans will have to wait one extra day than most of the country when they kick off the long awaited 2011 season on a Sunday night against the SMU Mustangs.  Our Game 1 Preview is below.

Main Things To Watch:

1)  Aggie Offensive Line vs. SMU Defensive Line -- Many Aggie fans consider this year's offensive line featuring Luke Joeckel, Brian Thomas, Patrick Lewis, Shep Klinke/Evan Eide, and Jake Matthews to be the best the program has seen in a decade.  Even though four starters return from the end of the 2011 season (5 total if you count Evan Eike who missed the second half of the season with an injury), in the coaches eyes this is still a young and inexperienced group.  As great as both Joeckel and Matthews project, they are still true sophomores.  Patrick Lewis and Brian Thomas are each playing new positions, and Shep Klinke could be a first time starter on Sunday night if he gets the nod over Eike.  The main point?  Coach Turner's group doesn't have a chemistry yet working together.  However, the confidence in the group is strong.  The Aggies face a tough task right out of the gates as they have to battle with 5 returning starters in SMU's front seven including all three defensive lineman. DE Taylor Thompson (5.5 TFL, 4.5 sacks) is an NFL talent according to some and is joined by 6'9 295 pound junior Margus Hunt (6.5 TFL, 3.0 sacks) who are the strong points in the SMU defense.  It will be up to the two young offensive tackles to not let them penetrate in the backfield.  6'1 220 pound junior Ja'Gared Davis is SMU's version of Von Miller, leading the team in TFL (16) and sacks (9) with 90 total tackles on the season.  6'0 230 pound junior Taylor Reed (145 tackles, 4.5 TFL, 2.0 sacks) led the team in tackles last season and mans the middle of the 3-4.  If the Aggies plan to get anywhere on the ground, coming off of combo blocks between Patrick Lewis and either Brian Thomas or Shep Klinke will be critical to stop the monster in the middle.  However, the weak point in the SMU front seven may be right up the middle where 6'3 287 pound senior nose guard Marquis Frazier (3.5 TFL, 2.5 sacks) resides. Running right up the middle and to the sidelines, away from the two athletic defensive ends, should be the mode of attack.

2) Stopping SMU RB Zach Line early and often -- SMU's Run'N'Shoot offense gives the impression to many as a pass happy team.  That is not the case at all.  SMU returns one of college football's best running back's last season in Zach Line who rushed for 1494 yards on 244 attempts for a 6.1 average.  Line averaged rushing a little over 100 yards a game (106.3) and scored 10 touchdowns on the 2010 season.  The interesting thing about SMU is they use Zach Line as their primary running back.  Their will hardly be any substitution to a 2nd back.  If SMU is going to be successful in this game, they will have to find a balance between their running and downfield passing offense.  They will need to run the ball on 1st and 2nd downs to put themselves in 3rd and manageable situations.  If Line is able run for a consistent 3-4 yards per carry, the A&M defense could find themselves on the field for long drives to begin the game.  Factoring in the heat, they could wear down early leading to problems in the 4th quarter.  Below is a video of some footage of Zack Line running the football.  If you watch the video it is easy to see that the running back doesn't play like a 6'1 235 pound bruiser.  He is quick and agile through the holes, but leaves his pad level up.  This could be a major problem for the running back as players like Garrick Williams and Steven Campbell will be gunning for his midsection standing straight up, leading to injury or possibly an early fumble.  Taking the primary rusher out of the game could be a major problem for the SMU offense making them one dimensional.  Also, don't count out SMU quarterback Kyle Padron who was the team's second leading rusher with a little over 400 yards last season.



3)  SMU Passing Routes vs. DeRutyer's Pressure Defense -- Again, a common misconception about SMU's offense is of a short, quick passing game.  Their offense is not like a Missouri or Baylor where a lot of their game will be short screens or other passes at the line of scrimmage.  SMU will want to have routes that go at least 5 yards down the field, with most going anywhere between 7-15 yards.  They will want to pick up passing yardage in chunks.  The only problem with that philosophy is those routes will require time to develop, which means time to protect from QB Kyle Padron from A&M pass rushers.  The good thing for SMU is they return maybe the most experienced offensive line in college football with over 180 starts between all starters.  6'3 306 pound Kevin Beachum Jr. at left tackle may be a future NFL player and the SMU offense will also return guard Josh LeRibeus after missing last season due to academic issues.  However, a weak point for SMU may be 6'5 330 pound J.T. Brooks at right tackle who struggles in his kick backs in pass protection.  He needs to become quicker if he intends to deal with an edge runner like Damontre Moore or freshman Tyrell Taylor.  The best thing to help out the SMU offensive line?  A running game with Zach Line and the ability to use draw plays to keep the Aggie defense honest and not letting their offense become one dimensional.  If the Mustangs can't make headway on the ground and get themselves in 2nd and long or 3rd and long situations, DeRutyer and the Wrecking Crew will send the house and that combined with longer routes needing to develop down the field may be a long day for QB Kyle Padron.

Aggie Concerns Going Into the Game

1) Injuries -- There are three injury concerns that should give the Aggies pause as they head into the opener.  The first and most concerning injury for it's potential long term is DB Coyrell Judie's shoulder.  While Judie has continued to practice, he has done so in a black jersey, meaning little to no contact.  Judie is the Aggies best corner and a future NFL draft pick.  He is the closest thing to a lock-down corner the Aggies have, and he brings a physical game.  How much will his shoulder allow him to be physical not only with a receiver at the line but also in coming up and helping defend against Zach Line and the Ponies ground attack?  We will have to watch just how much Dustin Harris and Lionel Smith are subbed in for Judie early in the game to give us an indication.  Jeff Fuller is another concern for the Aggies.  Like Judie, he continues to practice but has been limited.  A lot of the routes that Jeff Fuller runs -- the comebacks that are on him right as he makes his cut back to QB Tannehill -- are based off of timing.  How much will this timing be affected?  Will the Aggies biggest play-maker at receiver be limited in the first game of the season?  The final injury is Stephen Barrera, and is the only injury that looks to be long term stretching into October.  The concern is depth at the nose guard position.  Both Eddie Brown and Kirby Ennis will be more than solid contributors, but Coach DeRutyer would like to have a third nose guard.  The depth has been so much of a concern that freshman center Ben Compton was moved to the position to try him out and see if he can contribute.  With the heat of early September on Sunday night, the Aggies will have to be conditioned to play well for all 4th quarters.   

2)  Kicking game -- the one major disappointment leaving fall camp was the struggles in the kicking game once again to open the season.  Not only has punter been a concern where Drew Kaser has been out for most of camp dealing with a hamstring injury, but snapping and getting the ball to the punter also seems to be a concern. Battling Kaser for the job will be Ryan Epperson.  Epperson has potential, but has been inconsistent.  A&M will possibly be playing a team on Sunday that is in the top half of their opponents in term of difficulty and will be tougher than some Big XII games.  If the game is in fact close, a special teams mishap giving the Mustangs a quick touchdown or a short field to work with could be the difference.  It would be a shame to have a loss pinned on this facet of the game.

3)  Focus -- This A&M ball club is a senior and experienced group.  They know how to prepare and come into a game ready to get after it.  Still, the game is on a Sunday night, the day after most of the college football world kicks off.  Its not hard to imagine the team sitting in the hotel room on Saturday and early Sunday too amped up to get things underway.  They will have to keep their energy in check.  Also, there is the possibility big news involving A&M's conference affiliation comes down later in the week on Thursday or Friday (although highly unlikely).  If such a scenario were to happen, the Aggies would have to push their excitement level down that will be felt all across campus and in College Station and continue to remain focused on SMU, because the Mustangs won't care which conference the Aggies will be playing in 2012.


Quick Hitting Keys to the Game

1)  A&M's ability to stop Zach Line and the running game to turn it into a one dimensional game for SMU

2)  A&M's offense able to be consistent; converting third down putting together drives for scoring opportunists.  Also being able to score touchdowns in the redzone in case this is in fact a high scoring game

3)  A&M's defensive backfield being able to match-up with SMU play-makers at receiver 5'9 senior WR Cole Beasley (87 catches, 1060 yards, 6 TDs) and 5'10 junior Darius Johnson (78 catches, 845 yards, 6 TDs)

4)  Not giving this potent SMU offense a short field to work with because of turnovers and kicking game woes leading to easy points

5) Getting pressure on SMU QB Kyle Padron not allowing him to throw deep routes and big plays down the field

Final Analysis

It will be interesting to watch what kind of football team the Aggies will be entering into Sunday night's game.  Will the Aggies be the same team that went on the six game winning streak to close out the regular season playing good football or will they play a sloppy, mistake filled game like most teams will during the first weekend of the season?  The answer to that question will determine a lot on how the game is played.  We see the Aggies just being too much to handle on offense, particularly on the ground with Cyrus Gray and Christine Michael.  The Aggies should attack the middle of the SMU defense, and on the outside edge, away from the two talented DEs in Thompson and Hunt.  If the Aggies are able to control the line of scrimmage, this game should be easily handled.  Where the game could get ugly is if the Aggies come in inconsistent on offense, or committing turnovers giving the Mustangs a short field and easy points with to work with early.  Miscues will cost the Aggies dearly against an experienced team like SMU.  If the Aggies are able to build an early lead and stop the Mustangs on the ground, they will make the game one dimensional and that will play right into the hands of Tim DeRutyer and the Aggie's Wrecking Crew defense.  Kyle Padron should have a tough day having a clean pocket to step up and throw in; making it a long Sunday night for SMU.  The score will be closer than the game will actually be played, with SMU scoring later in the game.  However, don't be surprised if it takes the middle of the 2nd quarter or later for the Aggies to separate themselves from the Mustangs. 

Final Score:  Texas A&M 42, SMU 24.

BTHO SMU!



Around College Football Week 1

The first week of College Football is here.  Let's take a short look at what the college football landscape is looking like:

Big XII Power Poll: 

1)  Oklahoma -- Returning Big XII Champs earn the top spot in week 1 with 14 total starters returning.  However, losing Travis Lewis to injury and Ronnell Lewis to academic issues could bump them down in the future.  Week 1 Game:  Tulsa

2) Texas A&M -- Will be fighting for the top spot all season.  A&M opens with the SMU Mustangs who will challenge for C-USA West title and could be better than half the teams in the Big XII.  Should be a fun matchup on Sunday Night.  Week 1 Game:  SMU

3) Oklahoma State -- The Cowboys are coming off an 11-2 season and destruction of Arizona in the Alama Bowl.  However, the loss of OC Dana Holgerson and RB Kendell Hunter along with only 2 starters returning in the defensive front seven, the Cowboys have the potential to let down fans this season.  Week 1 Game:  UL Lafayette

4) Missouri -- In our eyes, even though Missouri lost 2 players in the top 15 picks of the NFL draft, with 9 offensive and 7 defensive players returning they could end up as the 3rd best team in the league.  Strength will be defense, not offense this season.  However, losing LT Elvis Fisher hurt.  Week 1 Game:  Miami (OH)

5) Baylor -- Hard to imagine the Bears in the top half of the league, but with 8 offensive players returning including QB Robert Griffin III, they have a chance to make the jump.  However, Baylor must prove their defense is worthy with 5 starters returning and replace two NFL 1st round draft picks.  Week 1 Game: TCU

6) Texas Tech -- It will be an interesting season in Lubbock as Seth Doege tanks the reigns of the QB position in an offense that isn't the same since Mike Leach left.  New DC Chad Glasgow transitions the Raiders into a 4-2-5 scheme which has no starters in the front six returning.  Week 1 Game:  Texas State

7) Texas -- The Longhorns are coming off a disappointing 5-7 season and only return 4 starters on offense and 6 on defense.  However, new energy enters the program in OC Bryan Harsin and DC Manny Diaz.  QB Garrett Gilbert will receive a lot of criticism, but the Longhorns need to improve in the trenches before returning to form.  Week 1 Game:  Rice

8) Iowa State -- The Cyclones finished 5-7 last season, just missing on a bowl game.  They lose QB Austin Arnaud, but that may benefit their offense as they can become more diverse.  The strength is on defense with LB Jake Knott and DB Leonard Johnson.  LT Kelechi Osemele is a future NFL lineman.  Iowa State may be primed to make a jump in Paul Rhodes 3rd season.  Week 1 Game:  Northern Iowa

9) Kansas State -- The Wildcats ended last season with a crushing loss to Syracuse.  They have added transfers in RB Bryce Brown and LB Arthur Brown who have been names on the CFB scene before.  There is young talent in Manhatten, but they may be a season away from making a jump.  Week 1Game:  Eastern Kentucky

10) Kansas -- The Jayhawks only won one game last year in the Big XII, and things may not improve this year in Turner Gill's 2nd season.  The offense will center around RB James Sims and watch pass rusher DE Toben Opurum who could end the season as the Big XII's best.  Week 1 Game:  McNeese State

Big XII Game of the Week: 

TCU at Baylor -- The Rose Bowl champs make the trip down to Waco to challenge the up and comer in the Big XII on a Friday Night matchup.  The Horned Frogs lose Andy Dalton, Jeremy Kerley and 8 other offensive starters. They return only 1 offensive lineman.  4 defensive starters return led by LB Tank Carder and LB Tanner Brock.  We will see just how much Gary Patterson's program has the ability to develop players this year.  Baylor returns Robert Griffen but loses Phil Taylor and Danny Walkins and must answer questions on defense.  Game will be decided by how many points TCU's offense now led by QB Casey Pachall is able to put on the board.

Prediction:  TCU 38, Baylor 34


National Games of the Week: 

LSU vs. Oregon -- LSU has had a very rough ride over the course of August and will be just glad to get back on the field, even if the grass is fake.  While Oregon will still be the same offense, they only return two starters in their already small front seven.  Even though LSU QB Jordan Jefferson has been suspended, last time we checked he didn't play on LSU's defense or offensive line which should dominate Oregon from start to finish.  Should be a surprisingly low scoring game.  LSU 17 Oregon 13

Boise State vs. Georgia -- Even though this game doesn't feature two Top 5 teams, it could have bigger implications long term for both programs.  If Boise State leaves the Georgia Dome in Atlanta with a W, it could be staring down another undefeated season since Nevada isn't in the MWC.  That could mean a potential BCS National Title berth.  On the other sideline, Georgia HC Mark Richt better start producing with a talented roster fast in a very weak SEC East or he could be shown the door.  However, only four Bulldogs on offense return.  If noting else, the country should be introduced to both QB Aaron Murray and RB Isiah Crowell.  Georgia 31 Boise State 21

Upset of the Week

Troy over Clemson:  It's now or never for Clemson HC Dabo Swinney who finished a disappointing 6-6 last season and 4-4 in the ACC.  Swinney brought in a name a lot of Aggie fans should know in OC and former Lake Travis HC Chad Morris.  This just seems like a program going no where right now even though they have the resources to be a force in college football.  Troy has played a lot of big BCS teams before, and led by QB Corey Robison their athleticism could surprise the Tigers.

Also on the radar:  James Madison vs UNC, Florida Atlantic vs. Florida